Skip to main content

No Country for Old Men



Chigurh's gonna getcha!


"No Country for Old Men" is easily the best film to come out this year and quite possibly the Coen brother's finest film to date. Yes, even better than "The Big Lebowski" (though indeed a very different sort of film).

Some reviews may appeal to ethos, pathos and logos to get you into the theaters to see this film. I'll simply appeal to your sense of enjoyment. If you like seeing films and truly appreciate an excellent, intelligent and gripping movie, this one is for you.

The plot is more or less this: A lone hunter (Moss) stumbles upon a drug deal gone horribly wrong in the outback of west Texas, finding a lot of dead bodies and two million in cash. Between the two, he wisely decides to take the cash. Unfortunately, two million dollars isn't the kind of money that gets chalked up by those who own it and so Moss finds himself pursued by a psychopathic killer Anton Chigurh (pictured above), who in turn is pursued by sheriff Ed Bell. A significant portion of the sheriff's screen time is spent reflecting on variations of "I'm too old for this" and "I'm not cut out for this", both of which are true. Ed Bell is outclassed, out-gunned and sheer out-eviled by Chigurh. Moss does his best to stay one step ahead of Chigurh and does a very good job of it, all things considered.

Much of the film is very 'non-Hollywood'. The protagonist (Moss) is no shinning hero, nor a over the hilt anti-hero. No pithy sayings, no epic battles, yet in the end, you wind up appreciating the film far more for it.

Sheriff Bell isn't your usual type-cast law man either. He actively fights between giving into cowardice or sticking to his sense of duty while being constantly reminded that he's not cut out for what he's up against.

Chigurh easily wins 'scariest bad guy of the decade' award, playing an eerily psychotic killer. It's a performance that defies the few words I have time left to type.

Words simply don't do this film justice. For all I could say, it'd take a book to come close to giving a fair impression. It's definitely a film where you come back after seeing it and upon re-reading a review, think to yourself "Wow, that was so much more than what I had expected after reading this.", corny as it may sound.

In closing, if you see only one movie this year, this would be the one to see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max Payne: The Movie - A Review

It all started innocently enough back in '01. Some company named 'Rockstar' put out a video game. It was like playing a cross between the best cliches of pulp detective novels and a combat system right out of the Matrix films. Some crazy fool turned it into a movie, and after seeing it tonight, I came to a few conclusions. One, the first video game was better than this movie. Two, this movie was still better than the second video game in the Max Payne series. Three, a few punches can put Max Payne in a hospital bed, but he can laugh off a shotgun blast to the chest from three feet away. If you're reading this, all you care about is 'should I bother seeing it or not?'. The short answer is, if you like stuff being shot up reaaaal good, go see it! If you're interested only in seeing Oscar-worthy movies, you'll probably want to skip this one. And for those of you sticking around for my humorous take on the movie... Max Payne is a man with a past. We know thi...

Green Lantern: Made of Fail

If someone gave you $300 million dollars and said " Make me an awesome movie about the Green Lantern ", you might think to yourself 'Ah, twice as much money as Thor and X-Men: First Class had - easy as pie!'. If you're director Martin Campbell and you've impressed everyone with movies like Edge of Darkness and Casino Royale, but secretly hate super hero movies and Hollywood producers with an insane cunning, and really want to make an expensive pile of fail, you'd have made " Green Lantern ". The short review - don't waste your money on this unless you *literally* have nothing better to do than watch paint dry. If you like comic books, or even just action movies, AVOID AT ALL COSTS. Where to begin... I heard bad things about the movie, but I thought 'How bad could it be?'. First things first. Ryan Reynolds. Generally known for playing slightly air-headed characters with a sense of humor and formulaic Hollywood looks. Star of fifty-two ...

The Hunger Games: A movie review

If I was to describe the hunger games in a single word, yes I know this is becoming a habit with me, it would be this:  Stark.  Having read the entire hunger games trilogy, I feel that this is appropriate, but does not necessarily make for the best movie.  Let me clarify though:  the very austere and even severe impression that I get from the movie isn't bad, it just isn't fun.  Interesting, compelling, provocative yes, but fun, no. A brief word to those that are fans of the series:  the movie is fine.  Structurally there isn't anything wrong with it and all the most critical details are left intact, as they had damn well better be if these people hope to make a trilogy out of this.  Being a fan of the series myself and having read all the books, I notice the glaring differences where small or large details have been left out and while I'm not thrilled, it didn't prove to be a deal breaker either.  On the whole, I would say...