Skip to main content

Dredd: A movie review



So first question to get out of the way:  is this movie better than the 90s version with Stallone?  Answer:  yes, by leaps and bounds.  After all, any film is generally improved by the absence of Rob Schneider, who is to comedy what cancer generally is to a healthy human body.  Now don't mistake me on this point, I'm not saying Rob Schneider single-handedly ruined Judge Dredd, although he is fully capable of such a feat.  The 90s version was simply cheesy in general, which is not bad all by itself, but this is a comparison inevitably and I'm not going to waste time with quibbling.

So getting right down to it: Dredd is gritty, brutal and totally unapologetic.  It pulls no punches and doesn't shy away from its deservedly harsh subject matter.  After all, I would expect law enforcement after a near breakdown of society following a nuclear world war to be pretty brutal.  I understand that there's an entire concept of realism vs. reality (where sometimes real life truly is stranger than fiction), but in films the audience really does have to feel like they can believe the premise of a film or at the very least suspend their disbelief.  In this case I feel that Dredd very neatly satisfies the criteria of realism as far as movies are concerned.  The story is believable, the characters are convincing, and I was very impressed with the set design which managed to convey the sense of heavily populated chaos that defines the mega city.

So, for the acting:  Karl Urban is phenomenal as Dredd.  His taciturn performance and amazing chronic scowl really sold the character of Dredd for me.  Judge Joseph Dredd is a hardcore badass and doesn't waste any time saying anything that isn't absolutely essential.  His body language, his attitude, his general demeanor all point to a man who is wholly committed to his duty and is utterly unflinching in carrying out that duty.  Olivia Thirlby turns in a respectable performance as the rookie Anderson and while I never read the comic books, I think her portrayal makes perfect sense for someone in her position in the Dredd universe.  Lena Headey does an excellent job as the primary villain Mama and really does sell the idea of a crime boss who is smart, vicious, and more than a little psychotic.

The story is actually pretty compelling combining equal parts desperate struggle for survival, crime drama, and over-the-top explosive action.  I can't really say much about the 3D, even though I went to see it in 3D.  The theater I went to didn't have their cameras focused properly for 3D so that messed things up for me a bit and I was actually a bit miffed by that.  I generally like 3D in movies where it's done well, but I understand a lot of people aren't really big on it, so just make up your own mind on that.  Although I will say that the parts where the movie was doing the portrayal of the Slo-Mo drug were particularly interesting to see with a curious opalescent effect that I think would have looked even better if the theaters projector had been properly focused.  Those Slo-Mo moments were also just kinda cool in general.

I was actually quite surprised by the level of extremely realistic gore in the film.  I'm not talking ridiculous unbelievable movie magic crap that's obviously fake, I mean blood spray and organ damage that matches up with my understanding of crime scene forensics and ballistic wound behavior.  I haven't seen blood spray this convincing since Stallone's Rambo and as twisted as it may sound I found it refreshing.  It seems the current trend in films is to shy away from anything that might offend anyone which translates into toning down any language, violence, and gore.  This is fine in general, but honestly if you're trying to make a film that gets across ideas like brutality, horror, and violent desperation, a PG-13 approach really isn't particularly convincing.

So final analysis:  this film is good, but most definitely not for the kids.  If you have a problem with gore, this isn't the movie for you. If you actually read the comic books, from what I've heard around the web you will probably like this a lot.

Peace out folks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max Payne: The Movie - A Review

It all started innocently enough back in '01. Some company named 'Rockstar' put out a video game. It was like playing a cross between the best cliches of pulp detective novels and a combat system right out of the Matrix films. Some crazy fool turned it into a movie, and after seeing it tonight, I came to a few conclusions. One, the first video game was better than this movie. Two, this movie was still better than the second video game in the Max Payne series. Three, a few punches can put Max Payne in a hospital bed, but he can laugh off a shotgun blast to the chest from three feet away. If you're reading this, all you care about is 'should I bother seeing it or not?'. The short answer is, if you like stuff being shot up reaaaal good, go see it! If you're interested only in seeing Oscar-worthy movies, you'll probably want to skip this one. And for those of you sticking around for my humorous take on the movie... Max Payne is a man with a past. We know thi

Public Enemies: The Cinephile's Enemy

I'm with on the false advertising in trailers thing: I think that studios that snooker you into the theater via false advertising in their trailers ought to have to pay out punitive damages in a class action lawsuit. All of the good shots of Public Enemies was in the trailer. Michael Mann owes me $10.50 for a midnight ticket after being drawn, beaten, horsewhipped, set on fire and quartered. I demand that Universal personally send Johnny Depp with my refund check, even though he and Christian Bale were the only things right wit the movie. There's very little good to say about this movie. I can't recall a lick of the score because it all sounded like source music. The only recognizable piece of music in the film is Otis Taylor's Ten Million Slaves which, if you don't buy the linked single, you get forced into buying the the whole damned album . For whatever insane reason, Director Michael Mann decided to film on cheap digital cameras.It's impossible to tell

Green Lantern: Made of Fail

If someone gave you $300 million dollars and said " Make me an awesome movie about the Green Lantern ", you might think to yourself 'Ah, twice as much money as Thor and X-Men: First Class had - easy as pie!'. If you're director Martin Campbell and you've impressed everyone with movies like Edge of Darkness and Casino Royale, but secretly hate super hero movies and Hollywood producers with an insane cunning, and really want to make an expensive pile of fail, you'd have made " Green Lantern ". The short review - don't waste your money on this unless you *literally* have nothing better to do than watch paint dry. If you like comic books, or even just action movies, AVOID AT ALL COSTS. Where to begin... I heard bad things about the movie, but I thought 'How bad could it be?'. First things first. Ryan Reynolds. Generally known for playing slightly air-headed characters with a sense of humor and formulaic Hollywood looks. Star of fifty-two