Skip to main content

Unthinkable: A movie review


Normally, I'm not a big fan of direct to DVD releases. They tend to have low production values, bad writing and sub par acting. However, every once in a while some titles will be released directly to DVD because of factors other than being crap. Sometimes a movie has a good idea, solid writing, and a strong cast, but the studio involved just feels like it doesn't appeal to a large enough audience to make a sufficient profit. Sometimes you can run into material that is either controversial or in the most rare cases, ends up with the almost superfluous NC-17 rating. As far as I know, there has not been a widely released title in theaters that held an NC-17 rating for as long as I have been alive (I could always be wrong about this, but I would need to do more digging before I found out for sure).



In the case of Unthinkable, the film runs into the controversy category for reasons to be straight lined to DVD. The main premise of Unthinkable is torture. Not that torture is good or bad necessarily, just torture. Initially that might sound like a very not-selling point, given films like Hostel that have torture as their premise and just suck lots of ass. However, if Hollywood proves anything, it's that there are as many ideas and as many ways to express them as there are people under the sun.



In all honesty, I should probably elaborate on the plot a little bit: an American born Muslim played by Michael Sheen has lost his marbles and decided it would be a good idea to use his special forces training as a demolitions expert to acquire nuclear materials and use them to create high yield explosives that he then leaves around the country in an attempt to get the US to withdraw from Muslim countries. Alright, so the plot is admittedly a little convoluted, but it has to be said that it is not beyond the realm of possibility. Hell, it's not even that far fetched when you really think about it: fundamentalist whackos are everywhere these days and nuclear materials are neither impossible to acquire nor are nuclear weapons all that hard to fabricate if you have the knowledge and experience. I think we tend to assume the idea is ludicrous simply because it's never happened to us, but I think that has more to do with the fact that we have a very aggressive national security policy and a lot less to do with the fact that there are people out there with the will and the means to do great harm to the people of the United States.



So you've probably gathered by now that there are a lot of inherent politics involved with this movie. When I think about it, I'm actually a little surprised this movie even got made since most of Hollywood seems to be composed of PC control freaks. Anyhow, the movie is dark and edgy and doesn't apologize for anything and I really liked that. There's also a very interesting dynamic between Samuel L. Jackson and Carrie Anne Moss. Jackson plays a veteran torture expert full of angst and madness while Moss plays an obvious and intentionally juxtaposed FBI agent who is very by the book and straitlaced. As the story unfolds, the interaction between the two characters can be seen as a metaphor for the dilemma of the human conscience in cases like this: can you really justify sacrificing one person for the sake of many? Even if the sacrifice is horrible?



Taken one step further, the film can also be considered as a look at human nature: just how inhuman are we willing to be when our backs are up against the wall? The movie posits that we are willing to be completely inhuman for the sake of our own preservation and I am inclined to agree. The drive for survival is one of our most powerful urges as humans and we can sense it on many levels, not just the personal and physical.



So I need to wrap things up before I drag on forever. This movie is dark and uncompromising and I liked that a lot. It stood up, spat in the face of political correctness and told it in no uncertain terms to go to hell. This movie is definitely not for everyone and would never be appropriate for younger audiences. But, if you think there's a place for the darker part of human nature in the inventory of necessary skills, then you will probably get something out of this movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max Payne: The Movie - A Review

It all started innocently enough back in '01. Some company named 'Rockstar' put out a video game. It was like playing a cross between the best cliches of pulp detective novels and a combat system right out of the Matrix films. Some crazy fool turned it into a movie, and after seeing it tonight, I came to a few conclusions. One, the first video game was better than this movie. Two, this movie was still better than the second video game in the Max Payne series. Three, a few punches can put Max Payne in a hospital bed, but he can laugh off a shotgun blast to the chest from three feet away. If you're reading this, all you care about is 'should I bother seeing it or not?'. The short answer is, if you like stuff being shot up reaaaal good, go see it! If you're interested only in seeing Oscar-worthy movies, you'll probably want to skip this one. And for those of you sticking around for my humorous take on the movie... Max Payne is a man with a past. We know thi

Public Enemies: The Cinephile's Enemy

I'm with on the false advertising in trailers thing: I think that studios that snooker you into the theater via false advertising in their trailers ought to have to pay out punitive damages in a class action lawsuit. All of the good shots of Public Enemies was in the trailer. Michael Mann owes me $10.50 for a midnight ticket after being drawn, beaten, horsewhipped, set on fire and quartered. I demand that Universal personally send Johnny Depp with my refund check, even though he and Christian Bale were the only things right wit the movie. There's very little good to say about this movie. I can't recall a lick of the score because it all sounded like source music. The only recognizable piece of music in the film is Otis Taylor's Ten Million Slaves which, if you don't buy the linked single, you get forced into buying the the whole damned album . For whatever insane reason, Director Michael Mann decided to film on cheap digital cameras.It's impossible to tell

Green Lantern: Made of Fail

If someone gave you $300 million dollars and said " Make me an awesome movie about the Green Lantern ", you might think to yourself 'Ah, twice as much money as Thor and X-Men: First Class had - easy as pie!'. If you're director Martin Campbell and you've impressed everyone with movies like Edge of Darkness and Casino Royale, but secretly hate super hero movies and Hollywood producers with an insane cunning, and really want to make an expensive pile of fail, you'd have made " Green Lantern ". The short review - don't waste your money on this unless you *literally* have nothing better to do than watch paint dry. If you like comic books, or even just action movies, AVOID AT ALL COSTS. Where to begin... I heard bad things about the movie, but I thought 'How bad could it be?'. First things first. Ryan Reynolds. Generally known for playing slightly air-headed characters with a sense of humor and formulaic Hollywood looks. Star of fifty-two