Skip to main content

Faster: A movie review



If I were to describe faster in a single word it would be this: surprising. Granted, Faster was everything I expected it to be, a violent rage fueled revenge festival, but it was also a lot of things I wasn't expecting at all.

The first and most surprising thing about this movie was that Dwayne Johnson is a good actor in the right circumstances. Either he was born to play this character or something else just synced up at the right time. Now I'm not saying that Johnson is a bad actor, I'm just saying that in my opinion, he hasn't been a terribly good actor in the past. In the case of Driver however, Dwayne Johnson's performance was excellent. His character has a constant agitated sense of restlessness. Even when he's not moving, you can sense the tension he feels and the intense emotions that drive him.

There isn't much back story and I think that's part of what makes the movie great. You've got violent protagonist X within murderous motivation Y and he needs to kill dudes A, B, and C. The plot is very simple and I feel that's what generates lots of room for solid characters. Driver is not just a murderous thug driven purely by anger. He's a murderous thug driven by anger who is still struggling with a profound sense of loss even years after the event. The plan seems simple: go out and murder a bunch of dudes and then call it a day.

However, things are rarely as simple as they seem at the beginning. From one step to the next, we see a depth and complexity to Driver that would not be obvious upon first perusal. Choices aren't easy and simple, there's a certain amount of thought and pain behind all of them, some more than others.

Aside from Driver, Cop and Killer, the other two main characters are also interesting and compelling in their own ways. I won't delve too far into them because I don't want to ruin anything, but suffice to say, these guys just add to Faster being a very strong, very character driven film in my opinion.

So should you see this movie? Yes, see it now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max Payne: The Movie - A Review

It all started innocently enough back in '01. Some company named 'Rockstar' put out a video game. It was like playing a cross between the best cliches of pulp detective novels and a combat system right out of the Matrix films. Some crazy fool turned it into a movie, and after seeing it tonight, I came to a few conclusions. One, the first video game was better than this movie. Two, this movie was still better than the second video game in the Max Payne series. Three, a few punches can put Max Payne in a hospital bed, but he can laugh off a shotgun blast to the chest from three feet away. If you're reading this, all you care about is 'should I bother seeing it or not?'. The short answer is, if you like stuff being shot up reaaaal good, go see it! If you're interested only in seeing Oscar-worthy movies, you'll probably want to skip this one. And for those of you sticking around for my humorous take on the movie... Max Payne is a man with a past. We know thi

Public Enemies: The Cinephile's Enemy

I'm with on the false advertising in trailers thing: I think that studios that snooker you into the theater via false advertising in their trailers ought to have to pay out punitive damages in a class action lawsuit. All of the good shots of Public Enemies was in the trailer. Michael Mann owes me $10.50 for a midnight ticket after being drawn, beaten, horsewhipped, set on fire and quartered. I demand that Universal personally send Johnny Depp with my refund check, even though he and Christian Bale were the only things right wit the movie. There's very little good to say about this movie. I can't recall a lick of the score because it all sounded like source music. The only recognizable piece of music in the film is Otis Taylor's Ten Million Slaves which, if you don't buy the linked single, you get forced into buying the the whole damned album . For whatever insane reason, Director Michael Mann decided to film on cheap digital cameras.It's impossible to tell

Green Lantern: Made of Fail

If someone gave you $300 million dollars and said " Make me an awesome movie about the Green Lantern ", you might think to yourself 'Ah, twice as much money as Thor and X-Men: First Class had - easy as pie!'. If you're director Martin Campbell and you've impressed everyone with movies like Edge of Darkness and Casino Royale, but secretly hate super hero movies and Hollywood producers with an insane cunning, and really want to make an expensive pile of fail, you'd have made " Green Lantern ". The short review - don't waste your money on this unless you *literally* have nothing better to do than watch paint dry. If you like comic books, or even just action movies, AVOID AT ALL COSTS. Where to begin... I heard bad things about the movie, but I thought 'How bad could it be?'. First things first. Ryan Reynolds. Generally known for playing slightly air-headed characters with a sense of humor and formulaic Hollywood looks. Star of fifty-two