Skip to main content

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (don't worry it's actually pretty good)

Image
By

Your note has been created.

Prince of Persia The Sands of Time: A movie review
Share
Today at 3:37am | Edit Note | Delete



Ok, so going in I had pretty high hopes for this movie for 2 reasons: the Prince of Persia game series was friggin' awesome and pirates of the Caribbean was a fun movie to watch. But I was worried like so many people who have seen beloved video games turned into crap movies: what if they screw this up and completely ruin the memory of something that was totally awesome for me?

We've seen it so many times: street fighter (arguably the worst video game movie ever), Mortal Kombat, Super Mario Bros, Wing Commander, Double Dragon, the list goes on and on. The appetite of Hollywood for cashing in on name recognition at the cost of artistic integrity can never be fully satisfied it seems.

However, all members of the gaming community can breath just a little bit easier this time (at least in my opinion). The movie is good, not great or spectacular, but not bad or mediocre either. In the 1 to 10 scale it sits comfortably in the 6.5-7.0 range, not at all unlike myself. The best thing this movie has going for it in terms of being related to the game is that it contains all the important plot elements: invading army, sacred relics, the prince, some evil usurper, lots of free running/parkour elements, very tongue-in-cheek humor by the prince, and a hot babe for the prince to chase around/save/get totally frustrated by.

Half the reason I went to see this movie in the first place was because I knew Gemma Arterton was going to be in it and she is HOOOOOT! (slightly elevated pitch in voice to add emphasis on juvenile fixation on smokin' hot babes). But enough of that.

What I liked most about this movie was the way it managed to capture the experience I had when I first played the game, which was a mix of curiosity, excitement, wonder,and just a little something I can't quite make a name for just yet. The plot and action of the movie are straightforward, the acting is good, the action is solid (as opposed to liquid, or supercooled liquid [like glass]), and the visual landscape is lush and beautiful. That last point is pretty important since this story is trying to capture the environment that inspired so many stories that have captured our imaginations for ages like Aesop's Fables or the Grimm Brother's fairy tails.

So should you see this movie? Yes. And if you're a big fan of the games, just relax, everything is going to be just fine (just try to relax and enjoy the movie and don't spend all your time trying to compare it to the games).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Max Payne: The Movie - A Review

By
It all started innocently enough back in '01. Some company named 'Rockstar' put out a video game. It was like playing a cross between the best cliches of pulp detective novels and a combat system right out of the Matrix films. Some crazy fool turned it into a movie, and after seeing it tonight, I came to a few conclusions. One, the first video game was better than this movie. Two, this movie was still better than the second video game in the Max Payne series. Three, a few punches can put Max Payne in a hospital bed, but he can laugh off a shotgun blast to the chest from three feet away. If you're reading this, all you care about is 'should I bother seeing it or not?'. The short answer is, if you like stuff being shot up reaaaal good, go see it! If you're interested only in seeing Oscar-worthy movies, you'll probably want to skip this one. And for those of you sticking around for my humorous take on the movie... Max Payne is a man with a past. We know thi
5 comments
Read more

Public Enemies: The Cinephile's Enemy

By
I'm with on the false advertising in trailers thing: I think that studios that snooker you into the theater via false advertising in their trailers ought to have to pay out punitive damages in a class action lawsuit. All of the good shots of Public Enemies was in the trailer. Michael Mann owes me $10.50 for a midnight ticket after being drawn, beaten, horsewhipped, set on fire and quartered. I demand that Universal personally send Johnny Depp with my refund check, even though he and Christian Bale were the only things right wit the movie. There's very little good to say about this movie. I can't recall a lick of the score because it all sounded like source music. The only recognizable piece of music in the film is Otis Taylor's Ten Million Slaves which, if you don't buy the linked single, you get forced into buying the the whole damned album . For whatever insane reason, Director Michael Mann decided to film on cheap digital cameras.It's impossible to tell
4 comments
Read more

Green Lantern: Made of Fail

By
If someone gave you $300 million dollars and said " Make me an awesome movie about the Green Lantern ", you might think to yourself 'Ah, twice as much money as Thor and X-Men: First Class had - easy as pie!'. If you're director Martin Campbell and you've impressed everyone with movies like Edge of Darkness and Casino Royale, but secretly hate super hero movies and Hollywood producers with an insane cunning, and really want to make an expensive pile of fail, you'd have made " Green Lantern ". The short review - don't waste your money on this unless you *literally* have nothing better to do than watch paint dry. If you like comic books, or even just action movies, AVOID AT ALL COSTS. Where to begin... I heard bad things about the movie, but I thought 'How bad could it be?'. First things first. Ryan Reynolds. Generally known for playing slightly air-headed characters with a sense of humor and formulaic Hollywood looks. Star of fifty-two
4 comments
Read more