Skip to main content

Terminator Salvation - Holy Crap, It's Actually Quite Good!



Terminator Salvation is surprisingly good. Given the disappointingly forgettable summer popcorn flick that was Terminator 3, the fourth title in the series didn't give one hope of being much better. Worrisome things like the fact that McG, the new director's most notable movie was "Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle" didn't help either. The fact that the credited writers were the geniuses behind the appalling Terminator 3 script really made it seem like an abandon-all-hope scenario. An audio recording of Christian Bale losing his temper on set was fairly amusing, but definitely not reassuring in any fashion.

Given all of this, I went into the theater with fairly low expectations, and came out stunned and impressed by what I'd seen. Certainly stunned by the fact that the movie was almost just as good as T2 had been. Impressed by how well everything had been done - the writing, acting, effects and the entire movie overall.

The scope of the movie's post-apocalyptic view of the future is simply breathtaking at times, the action is jaw-droppingly impressive with the unmistakably solid feel you get from sequences that were actually shot in real life, on location, not the green-screen cheesy composited sterile stuff that you see so often now. And robots. OMG, ROBOTS!! Giant assault robots the size fifty-story buildings, grim-looking chain-gun totin' T-600's and everything in-between. They're worth the price of admission alone. And the music drives it all home, with a score by Danny Elfman that really makes it seem like an epic Terminator movie. Overall, just... Wow.


The movie starts out with an interesting scene with Helen Bonham Carter and a death row inmate, and soon after that, a solid amount of action that really never lets up throughout the entire movie. Christian Bale plays a fairly good John Connor, though it's the rest of the cast that really pulls the movie along, especially the new friendly terminator played by Sam Worthington.

The future is indeed suitably post-apocalyptic, people are universally gun-shy (or robot-shy, I suppose) and seem like they've actually gone through a horrific nuclear war that destroyed the vast majority of humanity.

People in the future are also surprisingly radiation-proof, as John Connor and others go through nuclear blasts that should have teeth falling out and skin bleeding in a few hours from being so close to that much radiation. Not to mention the fact that John Connor can duke it out with a T-600 in a fist fight and not be dead after the first few punches. Although the skeptic in me dimly noted this during the movie, it really doesn't distract, and it's unlikely your average viewer would notice it at all. And that's really the worst I can say about the *entire* film. It's just that good.

Skynet has bigger and better robots, and some of them are extremely intimidating. At last, you feel like you're seeing what's truly possible, the things an AI with unlimited manufacturing and resources could pull off. Robots the size of buildings, etc. Skynet is still not very good at exterminating humanity, and it certainly seems to lack the tenacity the humans in the movie possess in surprisingly large and believable quantity. However, while you get the feeling that while it may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer at catching humans, it's got the 'overwhelming numerical and military advantage' thing down pat, and given enough time, wouldn't have a problem in killing off the human race in total.

Ahhhnold makes a surprising appearance as a CGI version of his 30 year old T2 self, and if I hadn't been told it was CGI, and hadn't seen Ahhhnold before, would not have been able to tell that it wasn't a human being. CGI, you've come a long way, baby. Some of the facial expressions, especially when he cocks his head to one side quizzically, gives one this eerie deja-vu that you're seeing Terminator 2 again, or somehow they really did have access to a time machine and got the exact actor from the exact same year to play a quick scene. His screen time as a human-looking terminator is short, but something that will seen as a pioneering moment in cinema for years to come.

John Connor goes to save the young resistance fighter that will one day be his father, and goes into the belly of the beast and comes out alive with him in tow. Mostly alive, anyway. No spoilers, I promise!


It's definitely worth your $9 to see in the theater, and for the first time as a reviewer, I'd be up for buying the DVD when it came out. There are very few movies worth watching more than once, and this is one of them. Color me happily surprised indeed!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max Payne: The Movie - A Review

It all started innocently enough back in '01. Some company named 'Rockstar' put out a video game. It was like playing a cross between the best cliches of pulp detective novels and a combat system right out of the Matrix films. Some crazy fool turned it into a movie, and after seeing it tonight, I came to a few conclusions. One, the first video game was better than this movie. Two, this movie was still better than the second video game in the Max Payne series. Three, a few punches can put Max Payne in a hospital bed, but he can laugh off a shotgun blast to the chest from three feet away. If you're reading this, all you care about is 'should I bother seeing it or not?'. The short answer is, if you like stuff being shot up reaaaal good, go see it! If you're interested only in seeing Oscar-worthy movies, you'll probably want to skip this one. And for those of you sticking around for my humorous take on the movie... Max Payne is a man with a past. We know thi...

The Hunger Games: A movie review

If I was to describe the hunger games in a single word, yes I know this is becoming a habit with me, it would be this:  Stark.  Having read the entire hunger games trilogy, I feel that this is appropriate, but does not necessarily make for the best movie.  Let me clarify though:  the very austere and even severe impression that I get from the movie isn't bad, it just isn't fun.  Interesting, compelling, provocative yes, but fun, no. A brief word to those that are fans of the series:  the movie is fine.  Structurally there isn't anything wrong with it and all the most critical details are left intact, as they had damn well better be if these people hope to make a trilogy out of this.  Being a fan of the series myself and having read all the books, I notice the glaring differences where small or large details have been left out and while I'm not thrilled, it didn't prove to be a deal breaker either.  On the whole, I would say...

Public Enemies: The Cinephile's Enemy

I'm with on the false advertising in trailers thing: I think that studios that snooker you into the theater via false advertising in their trailers ought to have to pay out punitive damages in a class action lawsuit. All of the good shots of Public Enemies was in the trailer. Michael Mann owes me $10.50 for a midnight ticket after being drawn, beaten, horsewhipped, set on fire and quartered. I demand that Universal personally send Johnny Depp with my refund check, even though he and Christian Bale were the only things right wit the movie. There's very little good to say about this movie. I can't recall a lick of the score because it all sounded like source music. The only recognizable piece of music in the film is Otis Taylor's Ten Million Slaves which, if you don't buy the linked single, you get forced into buying the the whole damned album . For whatever insane reason, Director Michael Mann decided to film on cheap digital cameras.It's impossible to tell ...